I have noticed that I have been using this
in my metatags:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
However looking at other peopls websites, I usually this:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
This site uses:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" />
What are the reasons for choosing one or the other ?
Is one of them somehow "better" ?
Thanks for any insights on this
in my metatags:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
However looking at other peopls websites, I usually this:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
This site uses:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" />
What are the reasons for choosing one or the other ?
Is one of them somehow "better" ?
Thanks for any insights on this

Comment